Confirm navigation and focus blockers.
COREaccess™ System
Digital Accessibility
Done Right
You shouldn't have to worry about ADA lawsuits, EAA noncompliance, or unintentionally excluding global customers. Bixli's COREaccess™ System gives U.S. businesses a clear, structured path to website accessibility.
COREaccess transformation map
From unknown risk to prioritized action
Current pressure
Accessibility risk is unclear
- Unknown barriers
The team does not know which interactions fail for users.
- Scanner noise
Automated results lack context, severity, and ownership.
- No priority path
Fixes compete with regular site work without a clear sequence.
Bixli lens
Technical findings are translated into user impact
Which users are blocked?Which pages carry risk?What should be fixed first?
Decision threshold
The highest-risk barriers are selected
Adaptive path
Supports are chosen for remediation capacity
Confirm barriers with automated and manual testing.
Rank findings by severity, user impact, and page priority.
Hold until recurring content risks are visible.
Better operating state
The team can act on accessibility with confidence
- Known baseline
Findings are confirmed, mapped, and documented.
- Prioritized action
Remediation starts where user impact and legal risk are highest.
- Operational gain
Accessibility work becomes assignable and verifiable.
Less uncertainty about exposure and a clearer path for responsible action.
Audit evidence becomes a prioritized remediation queue the team can execute.
EAA Enforcement Is Active
The Deadline Has Passed
The European Accessibility Act deadline passed June 28, 2025
Enforcement is no longer a future risk. It's the present reality. U.S. businesses with digital products or services reaching European customers face real penalties now. Most still don't know they're exposed.
Problem recognition
Accessibility risk is an evidence problem before it is a fix list
- You do not know which WCAG barriers are present on key user paths.
- A widget or overlay is being treated as a substitute for code-level remediation.
- A buyer, regulator, or internal stakeholder needs documentation you can defend.
- The site keeps changing and no one owns the accessibility baseline.
The COREaccess™ System
A 4-Part Conformance Framework
Our approach is structured, simple, and sustainable. We don't patch accessibility. We build it into your website and your team.
1
Audit
Deep accessibility audit combining automated scans with manual testing: keyboard navigation, screen reader review, WCAG gap analysis. Clear, prioritized report in plain English.
Learn more about audits →2
Remediate
Real, standards-based remediation. No overlays, no shortcuts. Fix the issues uncovered in the audit. We do the work or collaborate with your team.
Learn more about remediation →3
Train
Executive briefings and hands-on workshops. Build a culture of accessibility so new content and updates are inclusive by design.
Learn more about training →4
Monitor
Monthly automated scans and manual spot checks. Clear reports every cycle. Clients choose to fix in-house or have us handle them.
Learn more about monitoring →Overlay vs. real remediation
Accessibility has to be fixed at the source
COREaccess avoids shortcut language. The work is standards-based testing, remediation, documentation, training, and monitoring.
Overlay or widget
Adds a layer on top of the site without resolving many underlying code, content, and interaction barriers.
- Can leave keyboard, form, focus, and screen reader issues unresolved.
- May create a false sense of coverage without a defensible testing record.
- Does not teach the team how to avoid regressions as the site changes.
Real remediation
Finds barriers, fixes them in the site experience, and documents the basis for ongoing accessibility work.
- Combines automated scans with manual testing.
- Maps findings to WCAG criteria, user impact, severity, and remediation tasks.
- Creates a baseline for training, monitoring, and future compliance conversations.
What gets clearer first
What COREaccess makes visible
COREaccess is built around the evidence most teams need before they can act: which WCAG barriers are present, who they affect, how severe they are, and what order of remediation will reduce risk without creating churn.
When the shortcut stops feeling safe
The site needed evidence, not another overlay.
A small healthcare practice added an accessibility overlay after hearing about demand letters, then learned the core site still had to work for keyboard and screen reader users. The audit turned that uncertainty into specific findings, impact notes, severity, and a remediation path the team could assign.
- Accessibility barriers are tied to WCAG criteria and user impact.
- Findings are prioritized by severity and business-critical paths.
- Remediation can be assigned without vague accessibility language.
- Monitoring has a baseline to compare against as the site changes.
When accessibility stops being guesswork
Accessibility becomes an operating practice
These are representative operating-state changes. Bixli avoids guarantees of legal compliance, full accessibility, or risk elimination.
Before
Unclear exposure
The team may have scanner results, an overlay, or a vague concern, but no tested record of what users actually experience.
After
Documented remediation path
The team has findings, priorities, ownership, validation notes, and a baseline for maintaining accessibility as the site changes.
What the team can use
Evidence your team can act on
These are the tangible accessibility artifacts your team can use to move findings into owned work, prioritized fixes, and ongoing quality control.
MeaningfulAudit
Accessibility finding your team can act on
A concise finding that explains the barrier, user impact, WCAG risk, and the exact fix developers should apply.
- Clear barrier and affected interaction
- WCAG criterion, severity, and impact
- Recommended remediation for implementation
Remediation tracker
Shared ownership and progress visibility
A prioritized queue that makes owners, status, and verification easy for teams and stakeholders to follow.
- Assign owners and track status
- Prioritize fixes based on risk
- Confirm completion with verification notes
Training notes
Practical guidance for the team
Role-specific guidance for content, design, development, and leadership that helps prevent the same issues from reappearing.
- Next steps for each team role
- Examples and wording for consistent decisions
- A shared understanding of accessibility priorities
Monitoring baseline
A repeatable quality checkpoint
A reference point the team can use to compare new pages, content, and components and catch regressions sooner.
- Baseline findings for future review
- A clear comparison for updates
- Support for recurring accessibility checks
First 30 / 60 / 90 days
A defensible accessibility sequence
-
First 30 days
Confirm exposure, identify priority flows, run automated and manual testing, and separate confirmed barriers from scanner noise.
-
First 60 days
Move high-severity findings into remediation, assign ownership, validate fixes, and document what changed.
-
First 90 days
Train the team on recurring patterns, establish monitoring cadence, and maintain a baseline for future site changes.
Risk and readiness diagnostic
When COREaccess is worth considering
A useful diagnostic clarifies current exposure, documentation needs, team capacity, and the most defensible next step.
Where things get stuck
- You are relying on an overlay or scanner without manual testing.
- Forms, navigation, media, or purchase paths have not been tested with assistive technology.
- A buyer, regulator, or internal stakeholder needs documentation you cannot produce yet.
When this is a fit
- You are ready to treat accessibility as code, content, process, and ownership.
- Your team can provide access to representative templates, flows, or product surfaces.
- You want a maintainable baseline instead of a one-time cleanup.
The Business Case
Accessibility Pays for Itself
Legal Protection
Dramatically reduce ADA lawsuit risk in the U.S. and EAA enforcement actions in Europe.
Reach More Customers
1 in 4 adults in the U.S. has a disability. Accessibility opens your doors to every customer.
Better UX & SEO
Accessibility improves site clarity, speed, and rankings. It benefits every visitor.
Inclusive Brand
Be known for doing the right thing. Accessibility builds trust and long-term reputation.
Trusted Experts. Proven Process.
Bixli is a proud member of the International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP). Our team combines real-world business strategy with deep accessibility expertise.
IAAP Member
ADA Compliant
WCAG 2.1 AA
EAA Ready
Results-Driven
Flexible Engagements
Flexibility Built for Busy Teams
Done-for-You
We handle everything: audit, remediation, training, and monthly monitoring.
Done-with-You
We guide your team through each step, blending education with expert support.
Training-Focused
Ideal for internal teams who want to own accessibility moving forward.
Common questions
What organizations typically ask before starting COREaccess™
- Is our website legally required to be accessible?
- In most cases, yes. The ADA has been consistently interpreted by courts to require accessible websites for businesses that serve the public. The European Accessibility Act (EAA) imposes additional requirements for organizations operating in or serving the EU. Enforcement activity has increased significantly — demand letters and litigation are now common across industries that were previously untouched.
- We added an accessibility overlay. Are we covered?
- No. Overlays operate on top of the rendered page and cannot fix the underlying code-level barriers that create legal exposure. They have been challenged in litigation, named in demand letters, and in some cases make the experience worse for the assistive technology users they claim to help. COREaccess™ addresses accessibility at the code level — the only approach that produces defensible conformance.
- What does WCAG 2.1 AA actually require?
- WCAG 2.1 AA is a set of technical success criteria organized around four principles: content must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. Practically, this means things like sufficient color contrast, keyboard operability, descriptive alt text, properly labeled form fields, and logical reading order. An audit maps your current site against each criterion and identifies where barriers exist.
- Can our developers handle remediation in-house?
- Possibly, depending on their familiarity with assistive technology and WCAG. COREaccess™ offers done-with-you engagements where Bixli guides your development team through each fix — building internal capability while ensuring the remediation meets the standard. For teams without that background, done-for-you implementation is available.
- What happens after remediation — do we need ongoing work?
- Yes. A website changes over time — new content, updated components, third-party integrations — and each change can introduce new accessibility barriers. The COREaccess™ monitoring pillar provides regular automated and manual review to catch issues before they accumulate into a compliance gap or legal exposure event.
Start with a diagnostic
Book a Diagnostic Call
We'll identify the current condition, clarify the outcome that matters, and recommend an engagement only when the fit is clear.